The derivation of stream channel types is dependent on
DEM-derived stream gradients
and
DEM-derived
stream confinement. The digital elevation model (DEM)
cells are 10 X 10 m and the GIS methods used to derive
confinement and gradient probably obscure important topographic
information necessary to better describe these two stream
attributes. In addition, stream gradient was calculated
in degrees and had to be converted to percent slope. This
resulted in stream slope categories of 0-2%, 2-4%, 4-8%,
etc. Nevertheless, GIS data depicting stream gradient,
stream confinement, stream channel types, and even the
streams themselves were not available at an appropriate
spatial scale for the entire study area. Therefore, we
used the DEM-derived data to generate a first approximation
of these important stream characteristics.
Summary of Stream Channel Types for the entire study area.
| Channel Type |
Length (m) |
% |
| VH |
1,918,904.4 |
30.7 |
| SV |
975,285.6 |
15.6 |
| MV |
850,160.9 |
13.6 |
| MV-U |
686,758.8 |
11.0 |
| MM |
653,066.5 |
10.4 |
| FP2-3 |
416,717.8 |
6.7 |
| FP1 |
356,134.0 |
5.7 |
| EL |
136,914.6 |
2.2 |
| MC |
124,490.7 |
2.0 |
| LC |
61,525.3 |
1.0 |
| ES |
40,399.8 |
0.6 |
| SV-U |
33,872.8 |
0.5 |
| VH-U |
5,761.5 |
0.1 |
| TOTAL |
6,259,992.6 |
100.0 |
We recommend that information in these data layers be
field checked as soon as possible. Comparisons that we
have made with existing data suggest that these DEM-derived
layers may capture topographic detail that is often missed
in more conventional methods.
Please address questions or comments
to:
Dr. Ralph Garono
Principal Investigator
Earth Design Consultants, Inc.
rgarono@earthdesign.com
Laura Brophy
Principal Investigator
Green Point Consulting
brophyl@peak.org |
homepage