We tried several approaches to derived stream gradient.
The stream gradient data layer that was produced is a
computer-generated representation of stream gradient:
it is meant to be used as a study area wide surrogate
for stream gradient information until a better representation
of stream gradient can be produced. A good use of this
data layer would be to guide field teams and to field
verify where the layer correctly represents stream gradient
and where it does not.
Central to both approaches of developing a stream gradient
GIS layer were the
digital
elevation model (DEM) data acquired from the CLAMS
group at Oregon State University. DEMs were mosaicked
as previously described. Recall that the elevation value
assigned to a DEM cell represents the elevation of a 100
m^2 area as a single value. For relatively flat areas
that extend for 100's of meters, the DEM value is probably
a pretty good representation of elevation, at least within
the vertical error associate with the original data. However,
in areas with variable terrain on a spatial scale of a
few meters, DEM values may not capture topographic variability.
Ideally, a 10 X 10 m grid, such as the DEM, would produce
a stream gradient value for every cell based on the elevation
change between the cell immediately above and below it.
However, most of the slope calculation routines in GIS
generate a slope value from the elevation change measured
within a 1 grid cell (in our case, 10 m) buffer around
the cell. In other words, the slope of a single cell is
determined by the maximum elevation change from any two
of the 9 cells immediately surrounding each cell. This
has the effect of smoothing out the terrain. However,
in deeply incised valleys, such as those found in the
study area, stream gradient may be over estimated by this
procedure because steep valley walls may be included in
the determination of stream channel cells. In addition,
stream widths may be only a few meters across compared
to the relatively coarse grid cell size of 10 m.
There are at least two potential sources of error
in using GIS to calculate stream gradients: the possible
incorporation valley wall elevations into the stream channel
slope calculations and the relatively coarse DEM grid
compared to the relatively narrow stream widths.
We used the slope function in ArcView to create a slope
grid of the entire study area from the 10 m DEMs. The
slope function in ArcView identifies the maximum rate
of change in elevation within a 3 X 3 cell neighborhood.
This means that for each cell, ARCView examines the elevation
of the surrounding cells, selects the cells with the maximum
and minimum values, calculates the difference in elevation
and then calculates the slope as the change in elevation
(rise) over horizontal distance (run). ArcView returns
the slope in degrees, which has to be converted to percent
slope. We used the following conversion to go from degrees
to percent slope.
Percent slope * 100 = tan (degree
slope)
One of the drawbacks in using the slope function in
ArcView Spatial Analyst is that slope values are returned
as integers. Salmon biologists are interested in stream
gradient classes that occur in 1 percent slope intervals
(i.e., 1%, 2%, etc.), especially in low gradient streams.
Calculating whole number values for stream gradient in
degrees of slope, it was impossible to separate low gradient
stream reaches. Therefore, we expressed stream gradient
as 0-2%, 2-4%, etc.
ArcView was then used to intersect the slope grid with
the
ST1400 derived stream
layer. This transferred the gradient attributes onto
each stream segment. The resulting ST1400 stream layer,
over 440,000 stream segment records, containing the derived
stream gradient information was then merged with the 6th
field watershed [a-6th_field] coverage to produce a coverage
that could be used to summarize the stream gradient classes
for each 6th field.
Please address questions or comments
to:
Dr. Ralph Garono
Principal Investigator
Earth Design Consultants, Inc.
rgarono@earthdesign.com
Laura Brophy
Principal Investigator
Green Point Consulting
brophyl@peak.org |
homepage